Thursday, September 6, 2012
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Thursday, May 24, 2012
UberConference: First Look
Uberconference promises simpler (and visual) conference calls and it's free.
Once you sign up, you have the ability to import contacts from Google, LinkedIn, Yahoo and, if all else fails, CSV.
Also, you then get a conference number and PIN. It's permanent. All your conferences will use this.
Time for my daily 1-on-1...
with Batman.
Once you're done, your previous conference calls are stored in your history.
Once you sign up, you have the ability to import contacts from Google, LinkedIn, Yahoo and, if all else fails, CSV.
Time for my daily 1-on-1...
with Batman.
Once you're done, your previous conference calls are stored in your history.
Labels:
Design,
Startups,
Technology,
Video
Monday, May 21, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Kicksend pivots, sort of.
Before, Kicksend used to be like every other file transfer web application out there. "Share files easily with friends", they said.
<hypothesis>
That's not enough. How are they different? What makes them unique? Is file sharing really that big a problem??
They look at their logs and realize, "duh! everyone is using this service to send personal videos and pictures to friends". It's kind of an Instagram moment. Not many people sending across pdfs and docs.
Scratch file sharing. Let's be all about sharing pics and videos with friends since that's what they're sharing anyway. We also neatly skip the whole "sharing of pirated material problem" that generic filesharing services might face.
Added bonus, personal pics and videos are so important that people may be willing to pay to back them up in addition to transferring them.
</hypothesis>
Kicksend now is all about friends & family sharing pics. Tagline: "Send private batches of photos & videos to people you love". Awww.
<hypothesis>
That's not enough. How are they different? What makes them unique? Is file sharing really that big a problem??
They look at their logs and realize, "duh! everyone is using this service to send personal videos and pictures to friends". It's kind of an Instagram moment. Not many people sending across pdfs and docs.
Scratch file sharing. Let's be all about sharing pics and videos with friends since that's what they're sharing anyway. We also neatly skip the whole "sharing of pirated material problem" that generic filesharing services might face.
Added bonus, personal pics and videos are so important that people may be willing to pay to back them up in addition to transferring them.
</hypothesis>
Kicksend now is all about friends & family sharing pics. Tagline: "Send private batches of photos & videos to people you love". Awww.
Labels:
Apps,
Business Models,
Startups
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Facebook's Timeline is one of the Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2012...Really??!!
A Faster Fourier Transform, Crowdsourcing, 3D Transistors...Facebook's timeline(!). Rubbing shoulders with the likes of a Faster Fourier Transform, Facebook's Timeline is chosen as one of the Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2012 by MIT Tech Review. Really? Really? This is the best we could do?
Labels:
Technology
Friday, April 27, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Amazon launches AWS Marketplace: Think Google Apps for AWS...
AWS Marketplace Home (looks like a Google Apps + Amazon Mashup!)
A Sample listing (MongoDB)
Attend a webinar on the new Marketplace here: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/389831962
Labels:
Apps
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Calls to Inaction by Example: Leanpub and Greenpeace
Sometimes, everyone should write a really good call to inaction: copy that persuades you not to do something that is brought to your attention just before you're about to act.
Greenpeace wants me to remain on their email list. Their unsubscribe link says "Stop receiving messages on how you can save the planet". What it makes me think: Unsubscribe? What's next? kicking puppies??! I'll stay on the list.
*mission accomplished*
Leanpub wants me to publish my book. Their book delete button says "Delete my book forever, causing the world to suffer an irreparable artistic loss". What it makes me think: my book is important. It can change the world. Stick in there. You'll make it. By the way, leanpub, you're funny.
*mission accomplished*.
Do you have a good call to inaction?
Greenpeace wants me to remain on their email list. Their unsubscribe link says "Stop receiving messages on how you can save the planet". What it makes me think: Unsubscribe? What's next? kicking puppies??! I'll stay on the list.
*mission accomplished*
Leanpub wants me to publish my book. Their book delete button says "Delete my book forever, causing the world to suffer an irreparable artistic loss". What it makes me think: my book is important. It can change the world. Stick in there. You'll make it. By the way, leanpub, you're funny.
*mission accomplished*.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Too Many File Sharing Web Applications?
I couldn't quite figure it out till now. I'd see an announcement and I'd have a sense of deja vu like I've read this announcement before. I've seen this splash page some place else.
Now I get it. It's the attack of the online file sharing services. You might have seen these before: sometimes it's just a single page that says "Drag and Drop Files Here".
It's simple, it's elegant, it works. But, I'm wondering: what opportunity are these apps chasing? Sharing large files is a pain point, Yes. Is there a lot of money here? Can you charge people for it? What's the game plan here? Is the intent to scratch a simple itch or build the first cog in the wheel that will change the world?
Now I get it. It's the attack of the online file sharing services. You might have seen these before: sometimes it's just a single page that says "Drag and Drop Files Here".
It's simple, it's elegant, it works. But, I'm wondering: what opportunity are these apps chasing? Sharing large files is a pain point, Yes. Is there a lot of money here? Can you charge people for it? What's the game plan here? Is the intent to scratch a simple itch or build the first cog in the wheel that will change the world?
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
$10 Startup: A Leanpub Experiment
So I'm writing this book based on my experience with launching web applications with absolutely no budget. I'm calling it The $10 Startup. Here's the pitch:
The reason I'm writing this book is not so much the need for recognition or money: I'm doing it to see if Leanpub works. Leanpub intends to change book publishing by allowing you to apply lean principles to book publishing, you're "self-publishing a book while still writing it". The argument is that a book is much like a startup and hence "lean" applies.
The minimum viable product for my book is a cover design and a blurb so... the lean approach is working so far. Now for the really important question...would you buy this book and how much would you pay for it?
Think you need a business plan and venture capital to get your web application off the ground? Wrong. All you need is $10. Not monthly, not yearly. $10 Total. The $10 Startup will show you how to build and deploy web applications on a non-existent budget from start to finish step by step. In addition to enforcing a bootstrapper's mindset from day 1, The $10 Startup will help you validate your web application idea quickly and cheaply before scaling.
The minimum viable product for my book is a cover design and a blurb so... the lean approach is working so far. Now for the really important question...would you buy this book and how much would you pay for it?
Labels:
Ebooks
Monday, April 9, 2012
Start with a Customer, End with an Idea
Two guys are sitting around shooting the breeze. One of them turns to the other and says, "You know, we should build a better search engine based on number of links to a given page...". Fast forward a couple of years and these guys have gone from startup to internet behemoth.* Whenever someone hears this story, they lament to themselves "Why didn't I think of that? Links to measure page reputation. So simple!"
What most people forget is that they had no idea how to make money from it. They just had a great idea and ran with it.
That's how things remained for decades. Startups were a high-risk, high-reward game till lean came on the scene. The Lean Startup adds an element of validated learning to de-risk the process. The intent here is to validate that your idea is something that people are willing to pay for. Using minimum viable product (MVP) principles, you validate the assumptions behind your idea while spending minimal resources and time. Think of it as maximizing the learning/spending ratio.
From Customer Development to Product-Market Fit, the idea is the starting point. The idea reigns supreme.
Here's the idea-first process from a high-level perspective:
The problem here is that things can go wrong at any time in this process. Your idea could suck. Your product could suck. Your customers don't see enough value to pay you. When all these steps line up just right, you become successful. Else, you crash and burn. Not good odds.
Flipping the process is exactly what it sounds like: have the idea last, identify paying customers first.
So the next time you're thinking of starting something: Start with a customer,End with an idea.
* Don't tell anyone but the whole Stanford PhD story is pure SV spin :)
What most people forget is that they had no idea how to make money from it. They just had a great idea and ran with it.
That's how things remained for decades. Startups were a high-risk, high-reward game till lean came on the scene. The Lean Startup adds an element of validated learning to de-risk the process. The intent here is to validate that your idea is something that people are willing to pay for. Using minimum viable product (MVP) principles, you validate the assumptions behind your idea while spending minimal resources and time. Think of it as maximizing the learning/spending ratio.
From Customer Development to Product-Market Fit, the idea is the starting point. The idea reigns supreme.
Here's the idea-first process from a high-level perspective:
- Have a great idea
- Create a product based on the idea
- Find someone who will pay for using your product (or do this before #2)
- Repeat 2 & 3 with as many modifications as required (pivots)
- Get rich
The problem here is that things can go wrong at any time in this process. Your idea could suck. Your product could suck. Your customers don't see enough value to pay you. When all these steps line up just right, you become successful. Else, you crash and burn. Not good odds.
Flipping the process is exactly what it sounds like: have the idea last, identify paying customers first.
- Find Paying Customers
- Your objective is to find people who will pay for your solution when you try to sell it to them
- Find a type or group of customers who already pay for things that they get value from
- Small businesses would be a customer. They already buy insurance, anti-virus solutions, advertising space,etc
- Become Your Customer
- Learn to think like your target customer. Immerse yourself in their world. See things from their point of view.
- You should be able to rate a product's attractiveness from their point of view. What are their trigger words? Would they rather pay a large upfront fee for unlimited use or a pay-as-you-go model?
- Feel Their Pain
- Now that you are in their world, find their pain points.
- What bugs them?
- What prevents them from being better, bigger, faster?
- What part of their job do they hate the most?
- Have an Idea & Pitch a Product
- Once the pain is know, pitch an idea or product designed to kill that pain.
- Sell the Product
- If the previous steps were executed properly, you should be able to sell the product very easily.
The key advantage of idea-last startups is this: As you progress through the steps, your odds of creating a profitable solution actually increases.
Also notice is how linear the process is when compared to idea-first startups. There are no iterations. In the latter, you iterate and shape an idea till it fits a market. In this case, you identify a market and create an idea that you know they want. You identify paying customers. They're going to pay for *something* if they see value in it. We know that because they're already paying for things they're seeing value in. The best way to create value is to alleviate pain. So, we know that anything that eliminates or alleviates pain for your customer will be a solution they will pay for. QED.
So the next time you're thinking of starting something: Start with a customer,End with an idea.
* Don't tell anyone but the whole Stanford PhD story is pure SV spin :)
Labels:
Business Models,
Startups
OpenCNAM Caller ID API: Born from Pain. Easy to Use.
The best products always come from solving pain and OpenCNAM is no exception. In the founder's post announcing the OpenCNAM project, the pain is very clearly stated.
"Since I started hacking telephony code (almost 4 years ago), one thing that has always bothered me is how hard it is to find (and use) telephony data. As anyone in the telephony industry will tell you: the industry is huge, old, and fragmented."The solution is stated clearly as well:
OpenCNAM is an API company designed from the ground-up to be as simple as possible. The main idea is to make getting caller ID information easy--really easy.How easy?
If you're a programmer looking to use caller ID information in your software, and you can't get something working within 5 minutes of visiting our website, we've failed our mission.
There you have it: A clear pain point. A clear solution. A clear vision on how it should be. Did it work? Yes!
Now you'll know when the President calls you back... https://api.opencnam.com/v1/phone/2024561414?format=text !
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Your Startup can be a Freerider
What's a freerider? In this context, a freerider is one company using another resources without compensation. Sounds evil, right? Here's an example: people go to Gateway stores, understand the kind of PC they want and then order it online at Dell. Dell gets big. Gateway goes out of business. Does it still sound evil? More like the invisible hand of the market doing its work.
I was reading about Target's woes when it comes to competing with online retailers and it occurred to me that a startup can be a freerider.
Be Like Amazon
Clearly, free-riding is not a viable long-term strategy as the companies that are subsidizing your existence will eventually die. Let's amend the strategy to: You start freeriding at first, get big and then fend off secondary free-riders who attack you. That's what Amazon did. They were, at first, a low-cost alternative to offline stores. Customers do their research offline and then order at Amazon. Now, the dynamics are reversed. First, Amazon has a valuable resource in terms of user reviews of products (educational material and social proof). Second, Amazon may not be the lowest cost provider in a given category. Shouldn't someone be free-riding on Amazon? Nope. The Amazon user experience is such that it's very easy for someone to order something at Amazon once they've done their research. End result: Amazon did well in converting customers who wanted education into purchasers via a slick experience.
Find Your (Unwilling) Host
The key characteristics shared by companies that are unwilling hosts for free riders are:
I was reading about Target's woes when it comes to competing with online retailers and it occurred to me that a startup can be a freerider.
Be Like Amazon
Clearly, free-riding is not a viable long-term strategy as the companies that are subsidizing your existence will eventually die. Let's amend the strategy to: You start freeriding at first, get big and then fend off secondary free-riders who attack you. That's what Amazon did. They were, at first, a low-cost alternative to offline stores. Customers do their research offline and then order at Amazon. Now, the dynamics are reversed. First, Amazon has a valuable resource in terms of user reviews of products (educational material and social proof). Second, Amazon may not be the lowest cost provider in a given category. Shouldn't someone be free-riding on Amazon? Nope. The Amazon user experience is such that it's very easy for someone to order something at Amazon once they've done their research. End result: Amazon did well in converting customers who wanted education into purchasers via a slick experience.
Find Your (Unwilling) Host
The key characteristics shared by companies that are unwilling hosts for free riders are:
- Undifferentiated Products - PCs are generic, Groceries are generic, Books can be ordered from anywhere. Look for companies and industries selling products that are not differentiated.
- Unrewarding or Broken User Experience - Look for companies and industries where the user experience is so broken that you can just slip right between the customer and the host with a superior UX.
- Wrong Focus - Gateway had higher markups because they spent *money* to maintain a physical presence and workforce to educate the customer hoping that this would translate to loyalty. That did not work. Customers appreciated Gateway's educational service but their dollars went to Amazon.
- Provides a Valuable Resource or Service - Gateway providing educational services to choose undifferentiated products helped Amazon because Amazon did not have to invest in customer education.
Don't be an (Unwilling) Host
At some point, you're going to be a host. How do you fight off free riders (now or later)?
- Full control of Differentiated Products - Apple has stores. Apple has an awesome sales service. Do you see anyone free-riding them?
- User Experience - Make it easy for people to buy from you once they've reached a decision with your help (like Amazon does).
- Lock in Customers - Be so great that customers don't want to explore other options. Apple is such a great example of this. The people who bought the iPad probably had an iPhone. The people who bought the iPhone were people who had the iPod.
Labels:
Business Models,
Startups
IE and HTML5: The beginning of a beautiful meltdown.
Internet Explorer's HTML5 support (or perceived lack thereof) is causing some serious backlash. First, the folks at 4ormat decided to not support *any* version of Internet Explorer.
It warms our hearts to see the look of incredulous joy on the face of a job candidate when we assure them “You heard right, we really don’t support IE.”Then the folks at 37 Signals announced that their latest version of Basecamp used HTML5 to the hilt and the only way to realize their vision for it was to drop support for IE8 and lower. Stuck in IE hell? Their suggestion: use Chrome Frame.
Could IE be that bad? Well, apparently so. From a sea of million rants, here's an example. A chronicle of frustration (AKA blog post) whose title says it all: A Web Developer's Confrontation with Internet Explorer.
Labels:
Design
Monday, April 2, 2012
Zero Moment of Truth (ZMOT) from Google
Google promises a "new mental model of marketing": the Zero Moment of Truth (ZWOT). Read all about it and download the free ebook by Jim Lecinski, Google's Managing Director of US Sales & Service at http://www.zeromomentoftruth.com/.
There's also a whole new series of videos here: http://www.youtube.com/user/zeromomentoftruth.
Enjoy.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Pitching Enterprises vs. Pitching Small Businesses and Freelancers
If you're designing an SaaS product that's useful to large Fortune 500 enterprises, web design freelancers and everyone in between, I have news for you: you're not. You're designing a product that will be wholeheartedly rejected by everyone.
Users vs. Buyers
In enterprises, your users are not your buyers. In small businesses, the people who use your product are the ones who are paying for it (also see Why Enterprise Software Sucks). In enterprises, you're designing to solve the problem of the buyer and not the user. In SMBs, you're user-driven and they are the ones who decide whether to pay you or go with someone else.
Different Care-abouts, Different Products
Enterprises care about:
Users vs. Buyers
In enterprises, your users are not your buyers. In small businesses, the people who use your product are the ones who are paying for it (also see Why Enterprise Software Sucks). In enterprises, you're designing to solve the problem of the buyer and not the user. In SMBs, you're user-driven and they are the ones who decide whether to pay you or go with someone else.
Different Care-abouts, Different Products
Enterprises care about:
- Control
- They want to be in control of all aspects of the solution (kind of like a benevolent dictatorship), maintaining permissions and the like.
- Confidentiality
- The data used and generated by your solution must be secured (preferably hosted internally)
- Continuity
- They need to know that you're not a fly-by-night operator who will just sell and then disappear. They need to know that you'll be there to support and upgrade your product for a long, long time.
- Customization
- Whatever you have is not good enough, customizations have to be made to bolt your solution onto their existing stack.
- CYA (cover-your-a**)
- There's a reason why "Nobody every got fired buying IBM" is an awesome pitch.
- Cornucopia of Features (I'm trying to maintain a C-alliteration here so bear with me)
- They need all sorts of features that will assure them that your product will serve their current, future real and imaginary needs.
- Sometimes, Cost
- How expensive are you that they start to care?
Small Business care about
- Cost
- Cost of the product can make all the difference between usage and rejection
- Getting things done
- Your product better be good at something that makes or saves money. It just has to earn or save more than it costs. They will not have patience for bells and whistles.
- Ease of use
- The ideal ramp-up time for your product is zero. No introductory training, no customizations. Just log in and get to work.
Users care about
- Getting things done
- Ease of use
Pick a Side
There is almost no way that you can create a product that's easy to use, packed with features, future-proof, customizable and lets you get things done from day 1. Pick a side and work from there.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Startup of Interest: Clipboard
Clipboard is a web clipping storage site much like Evernote.
I had heard good things about Clipboard and wanted to try it out. I have to say I was not disappointed. The UX of Clipboard is just so smooth. Very impressive.
First, you add the Chrome Bookmarklet which, upon clicking, shows up as a hovering widget like this:
You can expand that widget to get more functions but the most-used one (clipping) is right out in front:
I had heard good things about Clipboard and wanted to try it out. I have to say I was not disappointed. The UX of Clipboard is just so smooth. Very impressive.
First, you add the Chrome Bookmarklet which, upon clicking, shows up as a hovering widget like this:
Clipping cannot be easier. Click the Clip button, choose a rectangle of content (you can also choose a whole page). I suspect that it uses <div> hierarchies of the page to create the rectangles.
Clicking captures the content and allows you to annotate with notes and tags.
That's it. The giant wasp has been saved for posterity on my clipboard.
Didn't I tell you it was smooth?
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
A Handy Guide to Figure out where you stand on Affiliate-Link Pinterest Bots
This post was triggered by the case of the super-successful Amazon Pinterest bot wrangler and the resulting discussion on HN. In case you don't already know the background, here's a summary: Steve (the wrangler) set up thousands of fake accounts on Pinterest, had them work with each other to vote up pins with affiliate links in them and ended up earning $1000 a day when people clicked on the links.
Here's an easy guide to find out where you stand on this whole issue:
Here's an easy guide to find out where you stand on this whole issue:
10: Steve is right (and smart). There's nothing wrong in what he did.
9: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using fake accounts is just wrong.
8: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using automation is just wrong.
7: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using low-cost MTurk web workers to pin your items is just wrong
6: I'm all for adding affiliate links but it has to be just you and your team of Pinterest cross-promoters without any automation or fake accounts
9: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using fake accounts is just wrong.
8: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using automation is just wrong.
7: I'm all for adding affiliate links but using low-cost MTurk web workers to pin your items is just wrong
6: I'm all for adding affiliate links but it has to be just you and your team of Pinterest cross-promoters without any automation or fake accounts
5: I'm all for adding affiliate links but it has to be just you (no automation)
4: I'm all for adding affiliate links but it has to be products that you've actually used
3: I'm all for adding affiliate links but it's not going to be by you (Pinterest, bring back Skimlinks and monetize, you poor thing).
2: No affiliate links. It screws up the equation.
1: I hate affiliate links. If I see it, I'll go to Amazon without clicking on a link, buy something for a $1000 and then add a screenshot of the purchase as a comment.
Labels:
Social
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Startup of Interest: GrabInbox
With Ping.fm transitioning to a paid version courtesy of Seesmic, I was on the lookout for another service providing functionality similar to it. Then, at some point, I signed up for Buffer (though I haven't used it too much yet) to schedule my social submissions. Looks like now I found an app that does both: GrabInbox.
It has the big guys set up to go (Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter). I'm just testing it out with Twitter for now.
Based on my timezone (India), it figures out the best time to tweet. Why is it that websites and apps think GMT+5:30 is Kolkota? We *have* other cities.
Here's my Twitter account as seen in GrabInbox:
It has the big guys set up to go (Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter). I'm just testing it out with Twitter for now.
Here's my Twitter account as seen in GrabInbox:
Other Goodies:
- Baked-in Analytics
- Bookmarkets & Chrome Plugin
Twitter's Automagical Advertising Approach (What if it goes awry?)
Twitter's ad came out a couple of days ago. It's does a reasonable job of explaining how to put promoted tweets and products work for you. You can promote yourself in two ways: promoted tweets and promoted accounts. It's pay-for-performance, in case you were wondering (you pay when users interact with your tweet or follow your account).
What caught my attention about Twitter's pitch was that you really don't have to do *anything* extra except pay. No searching for long-tail keywords on Google, no setting up Facebook ads. Nothing. According to the video, Twitter will look for and get your account promoted in front of people who have interests similar to your current followers.Twitter will figure out your most effective and popular tweets and promote them to this new audience as well. No new content is created. Twitter just adds a layer of zero-effort promotion on top of your usual activity.
Like anything that's so simple and easy, there is potential for things to go horribly wrong:
- Promoting tweets to people who are similar your current followers means you run the risk of either amassing a large mass of "clones", having a small initial population of skewed interests determining your follower accumulation trajectory. or both.
- How do you split test a tweet? How can you measure and improve your advertising effectiveness? All you can do is promote and pray.
Monday, March 26, 2012
List of (64 and counting) Places to Submit your Startup for PR
A laundry list of sites that I'm collecting on an on-going basis. A lot of people (I'm one of them! how about you?) are going to need this list later. Add new ones to comments and I'll update!
Beta Lists/Influencers:
- Beta List
- MoMB | The Museum of Modern Betas
- Invite Share - Everyone is invited!
- Hacker News (Do this first!)
- HackerStreet (HN India)
- Hackful (HN EU)
- inspiredBeta - Discover New Beta Apps, Business StartUps, Cloud Services & Communities
- startups | Startup Meme - The Unofficial Web Guide
- AngelList
- Connect With Startups on CoStarter
- Beta Invite Links (InviteOnlyBetas) on Twitter
- Tip Us | The Startup Foundry
- Innovageek: The free showcase for worldwide technological advances - InnovaGeek
- Launch Feed | Home
- Submit Your Startup – Rate My Startup
- D.I.Y. Startup news | Your startup news – no politics, no exclusives, no embargos and no bulls#$t
- BetaCandy • startups pitch influencers and early adopters.
- GreatStartups.com
- Startup Ticker
- StartupLi.st • Find. Follow. Recommend startups.
- BetaKit
- Startups.fm
- StartupStats
- Greatest Web Apps
- Gen-Y Startup
- Startup Booster
- Tech Hunger
- BetaBait
Listing your app:
- Web 2.0 sites and Startups - Ziipa - Suggest
- Submit a New Web 2.0 App! - Feedmyapp
- Online tools and applications - Go2web20
- Submit Startup | Alltopstartups
- Simple Spark - Add a Web App to Catalog
- Submit a Startup | GreatStartups.com
- Submit New Startup « StartupTunes
- Netted: Contact Us
- AppVita
- Most Built : Building the new web.
- Apps Mania
- Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips
- Directory with 2303 Web Application Reviews - AppAppeal
- Wikkid Apps » Totally Legendary Web Application Reviews
- WebAppRater | Submit your Web Application for Review
- Web 2.0 applications, listings, reviews, news, articles and all about web 2.0 from Neo Binaries - your definitive web 2.0 guide
- AppUseful | Web 2.0 Applications Directory. User Reviews of the Best Web Apps.
- Web.AppStorm | Web Applications Reviewed, Rounded Up & Explained
- Showcase | SingleFunction
- My First Startup
- NetWebApp - Web 2.0 Apps And Sites Directory - Latest Web 2.0 Apps And Sites Added
- Startup Meme - The Unofficial Web Guide
- Go4webapps.com - Web2.0 Sites, Web Apps, Web applications, Apps Reviews, Web development,
- MakeUseOf
- Web Dev 2.0
- On The App
- Net Web App
- Rev 2
- Tech Pluto
- AppSumo
- New Startups
- Productive Web Apps
- Minisprout (back after they fixed the Chrome malware warning)
- Startups100
- Consultiq (Bay Area)
- Apps400
- startUPpers
Any more?
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Shawn+Sean's Airtime is getting ready to launch
Airtime, the brainchild of Sean Parker and Shawn Fanning, opened up for early access ONLY via Facebook. What's Airtime about? According to the site, Airtime is a "live social video company" and not may other details are present on the site.
You'll notice one thing when you sign up for early access though? Airtime wants to access *everything* on your Facebook profile. The authorization page asked me for everything including my chat history. Looks like Airtime is not just Facebook-enabled but Facebook is an integral part of the experience.
Ohh, their Twitter account is devoid of tweets as well.
You'll notice one thing when you sign up for early access though? Airtime wants to access *everything* on your Facebook profile. The authorization page asked me for everything including my chat history. Looks like Airtime is not just Facebook-enabled but Facebook is an integral part of the experience.
Ohh, their Twitter account is devoid of tweets as well.
Labels:
Startups
Saturday, March 24, 2012
UC Browser: 0 to 18% India market share in 7 months
I was looking through a pretty interesting site that tracks internet browser usage trends and naturally was curious about mobile browser statistics in India. Opera was and is #1. Nokia is #2. But the real story was a contender coming out of nowhere to capture nearly 18% of the market to be close to being #2. What is this browser making giant inroads into the Indian mobile user base? UC Browser.
Source: StatCounter Global Stats - Mobile Browser Market Share
Digging deeper, I found it's not the upstart that I assumed it to be. Apparently, UC is the most popular mobile browser in China. That's all well and good but this is a Chinese export doing well in India. Normally, all I hear are stories about their own special versions of Twitter, Groupon and Facebook for internal consumption. A Chinese browser doing well outside China? That's curious,to say the least. What is driving this adoption? I poked around till I found their patent page which, to me, appears to doing a much better job of selling the browser than their main page! I was surprised to see that the UC Browser has a lot of features such as page compression to save bandwidth and cloud-accelerated browsing. So, for a cost-conscious country like India, I can see the appeal. If I saw "save on bandwidth consumption", I'd just skip to the end and click the big bright download button.
Digging deeper, I found it's not the upstart that I assumed it to be. Apparently, UC is the most popular mobile browser in China. That's all well and good but this is a Chinese export doing well in India. Normally, all I hear are stories about their own special versions of Twitter, Groupon and Facebook for internal consumption. A Chinese browser doing well outside China? That's curious,to say the least. What is driving this adoption? I poked around till I found their patent page which, to me, appears to doing a much better job of selling the browser than their main page! I was surprised to see that the UC Browser has a lot of features such as page compression to save bandwidth and cloud-accelerated browsing. So, for a cost-conscious country like India, I can see the appeal. If I saw "save on bandwidth consumption", I'd just skip to the end and click the big bright download button.
Labels:
Mobile
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)